2) Balance

(Preface: I don’t play Sins2 in the competitive sense.)

2.1) Combat overhaul

• Surface level, I love this rework. The Hull/Armor/Shield update opens a lot of doors flavor-wise.
• Thoughts on buffing the durability values & pierce values of defense structures (since they’re immobile)? They have a really weak feel to them currently. Aside from serving as target practice for an invading fleet they’re fairly expensive considering how little they contribute. For context I play on the larger maps in FFA, so I will have to contend with multiple locations being attacked. Having my defenses getting overwhelmed isn’t an issue, but the attacking fleets don’t take any damage and casually walk their way through enemy territory (I do the same to the AI). The closest thing I have to defending planets is how long it takes to bomb out planets. With the current build, it seems like the plan is to disregard defensive structures in favor of ‘base racing’. That may be fine for the tiny PvP maps, but for the large PvE style maps it’d be helpful if defense structures defended. My personal preference is that a fully entrenched, non-TEC Loyalist planet can trade the defensive structures with 1800supply of a generic, unspecialized fleet.
• Shields having the shield-burst mechanic is fun. Part of me misses shield mitigation though, be it a subtractive or scalar damage reduction – that said, having it return as something item-specific (like an auction item from an advent minor faction) may be wiser than having all shields everywhere apply it.
• Armor having armor strength makes sense. It’d be a little more meaningful once the repair autocasts are updated to try and repair armor while it’s still present (as opposed to waiting until armor is entirely gone). Then again, maybe the goal is a faction thing?
  • Vasari autocast kicks in to prioritize keeping armor up & running.
  • TEC autocast conversely doesn’t kick in until the hull takes damage (more of a flavor thing, as the TEC lack the nanites the Vasari have).
  • With this system, I’d assume the Advent are likely to have a “repair” that focuses on keeping their shields up & running?
  • From a competitive perspective this may not be appealing, but I think this would benefit the faction differentiation. If nothing else, I hope the autocast settings will be moddable.
• Hull & the Crippled State is the odd one for me. I wouldn’t call it a mechanic because it’s unique to capital ships, titans & Starbases. Thoughts on expanding the crippled state to non-strikecraft (in part to keep crippled state an option mod-wise, and in part because I don’t think a strikecraft could survive being crippled)? I realize most of those other ships would still be destroyed anyway, but it would appear more consistent. Otherwise, from an aesthetic PoV, it’d be nice if crippled ships would display “crippled hull” as a negative buff (even if it’s just a dummy buff intended for the UI).
•  Are there plans for superficial tweaks? Such as TEC Loyalist units having an extra 5% durability while TEC rebels lean towards an extra 5% piercing? Not as a research, but as something within the player entity file. Purpose of this is flavor.

2.1) TEC

• Thoughts on allowing the Sova Carrier to serve as a retrofit bay (assuming its corvette factory is at least level 1)?
• Defending as TEC Rebels feels difficult. The TEC Loyalist garrisons, if kept on defensive roam, seem to be able to hold their ground. But the TEC defensive structures overall are very easy to melt, especially once missile cruisers/frigates/bombers have built up to around 20-40 ships. Their ranged volleys feel like they melt everything that isn’t a ship. The armor upgrades for the Starbase don’t really improve things all that much. For most of my defending games, a fully maxed out research for hull/armor/shields still falls fairly quickly to a 1400 supply enemy TEC fleet (I haven’t been attacked much by Vasari AI in my games as the Vasari struggles more than the TEC at the moment).
  I’m not sure if it’d help much to improve the durability ratings on military structures? (I’m fine with how quickly civilian structures are falling at the moment – makes it viable to disrupt the economy, at least I think it does in my games).
  As long as I micro the Starbases to IGNORE enemy capital ships/titans and instead focus on the mass of frigates/cruisers then I can by just barely enough time to get my fleet to defend the planet (Starbase will be lost, but I guess it’s meant as a stalling mechanism in the current build?) Overall, my take is that defensive structures aren’t intended to do more than fend off small fleets (300 supply or less, maybe more if they are microed to attack capital ships last).
  The reason I prefer to save capital ships last is just to drop the incoming DPS. The capital ships currently have very good sustain; I only target them first if I have an overwhelming fleet supply otherwise my forces will dwindle while the cap ship/titan heals or gets healed. Currently, I don’t think this is a bad thing though.
• Thoughts on changing the TEC Hangar Defense structure to use less slots, be cheaper & house fewer strikecraft? The reason I’m suggesting this is that it’d be nice if I could place more of them around my structures in gravity wells – they are the only PD structure that the TEC has (Starbase PD doesn’t really help all that much). The Vasari Starbase can move towards the missile frigates/cruisers to return fire eventually. The TEC Starbase can’t do this, so having the option of using the Hangar Defense PD turrets to assist in thinning out missile spam would be nice. Note that I do want there to be an option of over-committing to missile frigates for the sole purpose of busting an entrenched Starbase, but I also think that static defenses should be able to hold out against forces up to 1500ish supply.. While playing as TEC Rebels, I watched insurgents wipe out most of my opponents planets despite them having quite a few defensive structures and the insurgent forces were comprised or random TEC ships (I had all ship types unlocked)

2.2) Vasari

• Thoughts on [Nanite Excavation Swarms] increasing the chance of finding exotics by 5%? Purpose is flavor...
• It’s kind of odd to me that the Vasari need research to colonize volcanic planets & terran planets, but they can colonize ferrous & desert from the start. Wouldn’t it be more consistent if the Vasari could colonize ferrous/volcanic without research but needed it to colonize terran & desert planets?

 2.3) Components

• I was surprised there’s a limitation on the number of deploy-starbase components for ships. There’s a limitation already on the number that can be built in a single well. I was planning to drop 4 starbases at once at a star when I discovered I’d have to run a ship back and forth multiple times to build and then ferry the component (was playing as TEC). Would it be possible to allow these to be stacked?
• I noticed more components have had ‘max count’ applied to them, which is disappointing. I guess the intent is for components to be faction-generic skills? If balance was the concern, why not add drawbacks for the components? The TEC’s [Volatile Accelerants] does this already, with the cost of using it being damage to the ship.
• Could the [Allied Crystal Market] & [Allied Metal Market] components also increase the planets culture spread by a little bit, something like 5%?

4) Bugs, Typos, Goofs

4.1) The lower section of Orkulus Starbase phases through metal/crystal asteroids. For the instance I saw, the resource asteroid had no extractor on it (if it even matters)

4.2) Media Conglomerate buff displays on Gauss Defense platforms, Retrofit Bays, Phase Jump Inhibitors & Hangar Defense structures. It doesn't look like the credit bonus is getting applied though.

4.3) Does the TEC research [Advanced Fire Control] actually do anything?

4.4) Should [Prova Jump Computer] show as a positive buff, once researched?

4.5) Should the Polluted Environment planet bonus appear on Asteroids?

4.6) The [Archaeology Center] doesn’t appear to name itself in the asset events.

4.7) TEC-Rebel Insurgents could have issues attacking if they’re trapped at an enemy planet that has a phase jump inhibitor active. After the planet is bombed out, the ships have an order to jump away that is reissued every second it looks like, but that order gets cancelled by the phase jump block. Is it possible to modify the depart orders to “destroy any phase jump inhibitors + destroy the planet colony” before leaving? Bombers & missile frigates/cruisers seem to be able to sneak in attacks on anything in range of where they sit?

My specific case had a crippled Orkulus Starbase dealing with 3 javelin cruisers & a few squads of bombers. The phase jump inhibitor was far side of the gravity well (and the only other structure left). With the retreat order given, I couldn’t order them to destroy the phase jump inhibitor. Once my fleet arrived & finished off the Starbase, the bombers were able to attack the inhibitor. The fighter strikecraft were basically stuck in place, not attacking or retreating. They were trying to attack every second, but it was getting cancelled by the carriers constantly trying to escape despite the no phase jump.

I wasn’t able to repeat this though at another location in the same game. So it may have been a one-off. I’m just reporting this incase it is seen by someone else later on.

4.8) Vasari regeneration bays don’t attempt to repair armor as it gets damaged, they wait until hull damage is occurring

4.9) the red lines show a pair of flickering phase lanes on the map Annulus. The flicker is periodic, and I see the lanes appear for at most 0.5 seconds. The phase lane that shows partial culture presence I think flickers out & back once every 10 seconds or so? None of these are moving planets though. I haven’t seen this before or since on this map. I’m just reporting it in case it occurs again later.

4.10) Should Nano Leech, Gravity Pulse or Dissever (Vasari Alliance titan) abilities appear as negative buffs?

6) Requests/Suggestions/Questions

6.1) For units in the ‘Crippled’ state – is it possible to apply a flickering effect to the windows/lights throughout the ship? I don’t mean a strobe-like effect. More like a flashing of 1/2Hz or less. If not, then would it instead be possible to “turn off” the ship lights (aside from the engines) as an extra visual for the ship being crippled?

6.2) Maps/scenarios

• Any chance of seeing a large/huge random map added in the nearest future?
• Any change of seeing some more variation in minor faction spawns? Or another swap regarding which ones spawn in game? I’d like to see some of the TEC ones get mixed back in. I’d be surprised if this is done before the Advent arrive, but it’d be a pleasant surprise

6.3) Planet Bonuses

• An idea for some more types of interactions, could [Automated Planet Factories] & [Industrial Wasteland] planet bonuses have an additional modifier attached to them – {exotic build time} - that could apply to exotic refineries present in the gravity well?

6.4) Planet bombing damage – it’d be nice if this was displayed via tooltip.

7) Requests: (for modding capabilities):

7.1) New planet modifier type: “max_insurgency_supply”. Concept use is shown below:

 7.2) Allow planet bonuses to receive upgrades from player research. This was a thing at some point in one of the technical previews I think (back when the TEC Loyalist garrison command was a planet bonus instead of a planet component). I made a little mod in the current update and I was surprised that it causes a crash-to-desktop at game launch. Apologies for having one crash report slip through (I clicked “skip” without commenting that it should be ignored..) The concept is shown below:

The reason for this request is that I'd like to see how the game feels with more "exploit" built into it, making some planet bonuses better for particular factions.

Hey Erebus, thanks for posting, reading it now, sent to Echo as well.