Sarcasm aide this was a brief synopsis of the basics of what you could consider when designing traits to constrain different weapons along with the traits to go with those weapons.  Right now we lost some of the ability to differentiate weapon damages versus armor types and with that loss the ability to increase damage for a specific weapon type, read this as the ability to reflect weapon skill.  So a highly skilled master or someone with several traits would be able to do a multiplier damage for swords whereas someone who is just trained would get less out of it which would reflect your general troops.  Materials could be reflected by adding new materials into the game or re-adding old ones such as Elementium or refinement to add high grade stainless steel.  Each of these materials could add a damage bonus without having to resort to magic.  Magic would then be used as the final way to add a last bonus when all other options have been exhausted.

So for a simple short sword lets start with the base damage plus modifiers.

Base Damage                                      6

Material (Steel)                                    1

Strength (Bonus to melee attack value)  2

Weak magical enchantment                   1(Changes the weapon damage to magical slashing so it can hit banshees and other normal weapon immune creatures)

Expert Swordsman (2 steps abovestudent)+50%

Total                                                   (6+1+2+1)*150% = 15

The weapon damage for a trained unit it would have an attack value of at most 10.  Melee champions can also boost their base attack bonus further beyond initial training making them much stronger and more deadly.  Combine this with a minor overpower effect at master skill level and this might be a better way to even melee champions versus melee troops.

Just a couple of history facts: The switch from bronze to iron swords was because of a tin shortage not superior materials. Iron was more readily available, the "expensive" swords were still bronze, and nobles etc. still used bronze swords. It was not until steel techniques "iron" became better. 

Also the Romans beg to differ. Discipline is the key to victory in army battles, not individual skill. They used something like a move forward, block and stab technique in army battles with short swords, not exactly much room for individual skill there. You've been watching too many movies, battles were rarely like that.

Not that I agree with your arguments, but if you want to use real life history facts for your reasonings, at least get your facts straight

For the materials portion, that contradicts what I have read and researched, but I have been wrong before and that I can concede if true.  For the skill portion I am referring to individual skill versus squad on squad attack styles.  Two completely different attack styles as one is about not getting hit yourself while the other is about attacking while not opening yourself or your squad mate to attack.  Individuals can in general do more damage as they have more options for maneuverability and openings for attack whereas unit style attacking is just as you described almost mechanized in how it was done with minor variations for simple blocks, parries, and attacks of opportunity when an opening is available within their small attack radius.

Not entirely sure what your point is here.