Actually, it is. Open city interface, in the part that shows the city look there's the enchantments displayed in the upper left corner. You can click on the small X inside the enchantment slot circle to cancel the enchantment.

1) Aha! You're a total lifesaver

2) Np

3) Hm I'll keep that inmind. I'm coming into this completely freshfaced (zero beta participation) so my knowledge of the game has so far come from the Tutorial and PDF manual. Kinda just defied logic to me that a pier can magically no longer be built because it's not within throwing distance of a city though I guess with the walls and such that could make some sense. The logging camp on the other hand baffles me since logging camps would, by nature, be some distance from immediate civilization. Guessing it's a game balance though though or I might just be daft!

Random extra question. I see you can delete custom characters but is it possible to delete custom kingdoms? I've been tinkering around a bit and have a few more than I'd like now. Isn't really a big deal but I'm guessing they can be deleted somehow or another.

Should be able to hunt that down somewhere in your "\users\User_name\my documents\my games\fallen enchantress" folder. It's on a request list somewhere to be able to do that from within the game.

Agreed.  Even if the intent was to simplify strategic depth for the average user by removing the requirement that buildings be manually placed in order for more effective cities to be developed (difficult to teach the AI?), in going against not only intuition, but also the fact that you CAN snake your ZoC to obtain resources, it appears little has been gained but confusion.

It's definately something that I hope to see a mod on in the near future:

1. When building your city, you are now restricted from some of the more unique buildings that are offered in the game all because you happened to not build in a location EXACTLY beside a forest or river.
2. There are several other aspects about city building that have a simple and an advanced design type, toggled by the building placement option (which was the reason why snaking was eliminated -- they didn't want to confuse players who chose simple). Some examples showing that 'snaking' still exists are:
1. Reaching out towards a resource just outside of your ZoC.
2. Reaching out towards a bottleneck or pass, cutting off AI from crossing.
3. Building on adjacent forests. Without manual placement, the autoplace can 'bury' your forest...and there is NO undo. It's lost.
4. Reaching out to tie city ZofC together with your capital.
3. The AI operate as if snaking WAS possible. Very frustrating. So many times I see AI build a city in a LESS optimal location, just out of reach from a forest or river tile, thinking that it will expand to it in the future....except they NEVER can build those vital improvements. I pretty much have to do scorched earth policy now, destroying all AI cities to REBUILD them in their proper spots.

Anyways, as you can see, there is a pretty strong case for snaking to be a viable option. At the VERY least, tie the mechanic in with the Manual Placement option or have its own option to activate.