It doesn't tell me that at all. What it tells me is that they listened to the community, looked at the evidence, and then implemented a change. GPG has been very responsive to addressing balance. Erebus needed a nerf. Priests should not be a liability. HoL was way out of whack. I'd far rather have them prioritize balance. And besides, if your statement were true, they'd be doing everything you asked for right now.
What your post tells me is that you played the game all of 5 minutes after the patch and then decided that you couldn't rely on HoL anymore so you decided to complain about their priorities on intraweb. You even concede that HoL needed a nerf. How is that pandering to the whiners on the board?
Ok Captain Defensive,
First of all, the responsiveness of GPG is, in no way, in question. I've stated this before, but I am over-joyed that the game devs are adhering to feedback from the gaming community. On the other hand, just fixing things that are undoubtedly a minor issue which could be ignored while still keeping the game afloat, is detrimental. The reason being: issues that should have been remedied pre-launch need to be postponed even more.
Secondly, regarding the HoL nerf, I DID admit it needed a nerf; however, the majority can protest that the nerf was overkill. Who, in their right mind, is going to buy the HoL now? It's virtually non-existent now. Before the nerf, how many DGs were OP because of it? Oak? If you used it quickly with the Orb of Defiance or a certain skill like Mist with Erebus? It needed a nerf, but not an execution.
Lastly, I play this game excessively. 5 minutes? Your pitiful attempt to degrade my post and my experience is laughable. I am the type of player that uses all of the DGs. I didn't just use Oak + HoL in Pantheon, Skirmish, or Custom Games. Depending on the opposition's setup of DGs, I use a particular DG accordingly. In fact, I tried to revolve my various specs with different DG EXCLUDING the HoL. Why? Because I knew a nerf was inevitable and was already trying to figure out ways around it.
It's always fun trying to post against the majority. I'm ending my responses with this last reply. I tried to show a different angle on this particular subject, but of course, any other view but the majority one is wrong and deserves flaming. LOL.