BAD, FUZZY! BAD! funny but bad.

Why would we have ot buy it? it should just be an update!!!!

You're wrong they should all be on games development

Could be funny, but that seems to be the sad truth.

Object Desktop 2012 : Reduced to WindowBlinds and IconPackager...

Like Windows 7 is "Just an update" for Windows 1.1.

1. It'll be here when it gets here. How many times does that have to be said/written?

2. Asking "When is OD 2.0 going to be published?" again and again is a waste of time. It won't make it arrive one second sooner.

You can either spend your life enjoying what you have or worrying about what you don't.  Seriously.  It's a cool little piece of software, but that's all it is, and it does what it does and doesn't do what it doesn't do, just like everything else.  There's just no point in staring at the warts.

Why?, has it changed from when you used to enjoy it.

Its just a piece of software which does its job well, that's why it has the largest market share.

I agree with Dave, why worry about something which you can't control. It has some small bugs but they are easy to work around, if they frustrate you so much, move on or wait for 2.0 (someday soon I hope).

You know, you can filter the gallery...Right after where it says ObjectDock there's All Categories.  Click on the dropdown arrow right before that and you get the filter list.  Select Dock Icons, you get only icons.  Select Dock Backgrounds, you get only backgrounds.  Select Docklets, you get...only docklets.

Yes and No. Yes, it has changed, because the 1.9 build has bugs in it and the beta build has bugs. No because it hasn't changed to be better by being bug-free. My circumstances also changed. When I bought OD+, I was using Windows XP and there were bugs, then I moved onto Windows Vista and there were bugs, now I'm on Windows 7 and...guess what?...there are still bugs present. One cannot enjoy a piece of software that has bugs in it. Clearly, Stardock do not wish for us to enjoy it if they do not care enough to update it for over 2 years.

It's a piece of software that does the job better than its rivals, that's not the same as doing its job well, because as far as I'm concerned, with all the bugs and incompatibilities considered, it's not doing its job well.

I don't think it's a matter of worrying about something I cannot control. In fact, that's part of the problem: cries of many a user about OD's problems seem to fall on deaf ears and there's little else we can do apart from biting the bullet. Small bugs that are easy to work around? Is than an excuse for software to have bugs? Have you seen the Bugs thread?

Moving on is difficult, because it has a lot of features that do work well. Besides, I paid for OD+, moving on would be a waste of money. Waiting for OD+ 2.0 is also challenging, because it has been such a long time since OD got any updates. All we got were a few screenshots of a new build and nothing else. Feels like an insult to the community, many of whom help out as much as they could: submitting bug reports, suggesting features, helping newcomers on the forums etc. What do we get in return? A pittance at best. I happen to be passionate about OD, because it was one of the first pieces of software (excl games) that I bought, so that's why I say the things I say.

By doing a major build the little things are kept to the sidelines. I am sure the bugs will be addressed with 2.0.

That's not fair for those who have issues with 1.9 release and latest beta build. Stardock usually charges for upgrades (i.e 1.x to 2.x), so people who have been waiting for over 2 years will be forced to fork out extra to get those fixes. I'd be annoyed to say the least if that happens.