Soletaken
ZJBDragon call me a flamer all you want but im now convinced you post utter misleading rubbish in threads just for fun.Kiting is a valid strat however 15 lrms will still kill your cap ship. I can have this many lrms by the first wave of pirates.Additionally STOP WITH THE MISINFORMATION.I see so many posts in these forums saying do this to beat lrms.Let me clear this up for you nice and easy. There is only 2 real ways you are going to beat a tec lrm rusher as advent and by beat i mean hold you own and ultimately lose to tec because they are superior in this patch.Number 1. Radiance cap ship and repair bays.Number 2. Mothership + malice + defense vessals
Depending on the level of the Halcyon, yes, you can do it with a single Halcyon. It depends on the number of enemy LRM's and the level of the Halcyon. A single Halcyon isn't always enough which is why I specifically mentioned you can use multiple too. I guess you didn't read that.
Now, for your misinformation:
1. Radiance and repair bays -- Last time I checked, repair bays were planetary structures and did not follow around a radiance. Sure, you can back it up with a guardian or progenitor, but those will become the LRM primary target. What you're suggesting is to turtle in a gravity well and let the enemy LRM spam you. This results in you maybe handling the first spam, but the moment you go on offense the opponent has replaced the LRM spam fleet rendering this useless unless the radiance has serious backup. Halcyon(s) and drone hosts kiting can easily handle an LRM spam fleet much better.
2. Mothership + malice + defense vessels -- Ah, the brute force method. This is just as valid as my kiting method.
Soletaken, we must not be playing the same game for you to declare all my posts globally rubbish. I wouldn't be spouting this stuff off if it didn't work. Admittedly, I've played approximately 2 dozen matches now against/with mainly 8 or 9 friends and tend to avoid the general multiplayer populous for various reasons. That doesn't mean I haven't been LRM spammed (actually, assailant spamming is much more common) or don't know what I'm talking about. My way of playing is quite a bit different from the way everyone else I've played goes about doing things. I rely heavily on strategic positioning. I quite often use flanking, distraction forces, or cat and mouse. I'm always surprised at how easy it is to lure someone across a phase lane and then jump in a big force sitting adjacent to the action for a quick ambush. I don't play to win--I play to outsmart you. There's a difference in approach.